JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 21, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Beatriz Ramirez·Respondent Direccion De Sanidad Militar Del Ejercito Nacional

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Segunda de Revisión decide SUSPENDER los términos para fallar por dos meses, para permitir que las pruebas decretadas previamente se incorporen al proceso, se corra traslado de las mismas a todos los sujetos procesales y se elabore un proyecto de decisión con fundamento en ellas.

Lo anterior, conforme a lo previsto en el artículo 64 del Acuerdo 02 de 2015.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Conforme a lo previsto en el artículo 64 del Acuerdo 02 de 2015, SUSPENDER los términos para fallar el presente proceso, por dos meses, a partir de esta fecha.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra este auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela